3 Recreating the Self

The process begins when we seek self-knowledge. The brain can be visualized evolving in
four stages or on four levels. First a central nervous system controlling autonomic
responses such as breathing and heart rate clumped in an area of the brain called the
reptilian complex. The next level of "intelligence" developing was the emotional center/
limbic system responsible for the more or less reflexive responses such as flight/ fight and
love/ hate. Then the cognitive center in the cerebral area of the brain yielded our
outstanding analytical and problem solving capabilities. Lastly, in a fourth and ongoing
phase of mental evolution, we are developing the capability to view situations in a
perspective leading to the philosophical questioning of the meaning of life and what we
"should" be doing. This is quite different than problem solving since it enables us to
visualize problems in context and understand the interrelatedness of our behavior to the
world around us. This is the intelligence we must nourish to give us the strength and
wisdom to constructively change our interactions with each other and our environment.

Maybe the easiest way to understand this fourth level of mental activity is to think of it as
holistic awareness. Thinking of the self holistically would include the many aspects of
self-fulfillment -- such as sexuality, artistic and musical abilities, intellectual development,
and generally the awareness of ones desires and interests in the widest possible sense.
Thinking of the self holistically in the context of others entails developing an understanding
of justice or what it means to treat others fairly in keeping with the overall welfare for the
all of life. And this awareness would inevitably lead to the development of an
understanding of the self in ecological balance with all forms of life. The growing
awareness of what we know should lead to an awareness of the limits of our knowledge
and the relatively meager understanding we have of the world around us. This is the
source of spirituality. The "unknown" and our relationship to it. Do we name it, pray to it,
or worship it? Do we view it with awe or ignore it? Or do we deny the existence of all that
we do not understand? Whatever we do we should not attempt to define what we do not
understand and call it the one way. This is in the realm of fanaticism, and we should be
aware that our biologically driven tendency to do this undermines our attempts to live
harmoniously with the world around us. It not only leads to greater human misery but a
growing level of misery for all life.

The ability to rise above the emotional reaction of the moment, place events in
perspective, and evaluate responses, evolves out of self-knowledge. The journey can take
many different paths, but the wise men have commonly sought quietude remote from
distractions so as to facilitate reflection. They found that solitude was necessary to put
their lives in a perspective so that they could comprehend their spiritual essence. And
illumination would yield values in harmony with their being. "Seeing" the spirit of life, or
the harmonious resonance transcending the all of Nature, necessarily leads to an
understanding of our relatedness to all forms of life, and how the welfare of one form is
inextricably connected to the welfare of others.

Values or principles consistent with our best intelligence flow from this quest for
self-knowledge. Vested interests, and others with ulterior motives, have often used the
seductive power of religious belief to exhort us to revere the work of others. Teachings
deemed sacred by the dogmatists (like the Bible or Koran) are held as the inerrant words
or teachings of God. Yet in the eyes of those who have studied these documents, they
offer little more than some conventional thinking of the times couched in myths and stories
to help make them palatably interesting and understandable. For example, consider the
legend of Moses receiving the Ten Commandments as a result of his unification with God.
Some obviously reflect a bit of common sense wisdom -- but others address the number
of permissible gods, stipulate that God should not be dishonored with "graven images",
and refer to swearing, working on the Sabbath, or coveting your neighbor's possessions.
The documents were drafted thousands of years ago and were interpreted and massaged
many times for many purposes using numerous languages. In the context of life today they
seem confusing and out of touch with reality. And as a result of deferring to this type of
thinking, and a lot of other similar fuzzy guidance from the past, our morality is often
hypocritical and unreasonable. Our leaders seem to fret over using a blob of stem cells the
size of a pinhead for medical research, but display little concern over the loss of innocent
human life and senseless carnage resulting from the endless "wars" justified by reasoning
known to be specious and conflicted.

The wise believed that we should develop our own principles consistent with our own
self-knowledge and be true to them. There is nothing in their words encouraging us to
revere the graven or foolish images couched in the belief systems fabricated by others.
They knew a God would not speak in riddles, or want us to do the nonsensical in his
(her?) name.